Legislative root canal Dentists, alas,
still fight hygienist bill
The Sacramento Bee
July 5, 2006
A bill that would allow dental hygienists to clean teeth
without a prescription barely won approval in the Senate
Business and Professions Committee last week -- no thanks
to the California Dental Association or the Senate's only
dentist, Sen. Sam Aanestad, R-Grass Valley, who voted
"no."
Shame on them.
The state's dentists have doggedly fought this sensible
measure for months now. The bill, AB 1334 by Sen. Simon
Salinas, D-Salinas, would allow specially trained dental
hygienists to clean people's teeth and perform other oral
health services without those patients first having to
get a prescription from a dentist.
The prescription requirement, in law since 1998, has
proved to be a significant barrier to dental care, particularly
for the poor, the disabled and the elderly confined to
nursing homes. Because many such people have no insurance
and thus no access to dentists, they have no way to get
prescriptions that would allow hygienists to perform their
services.
Dentists claim they are opposed because patients would
be placed at risk if seen by hygienists not working in
a dentist's office. The terms of the bill and the available
evidence make that hard to believe.
The hygienists allowed to practice independently under
the Salinas bill must possess a B.A. degree or the equivalent.
In addition, they must have a minimum of 2,000 hours
of clinical training, complete 150 hours of an approved
educational program and pass a written examination. Finally,
they must have a contractual relationship with a dentist.
In many cases, the hygienists will be assessing patients
and referring them to dentists.
In three other states where hygienists can clean teeth
and perform other dental health procedures without direct
supervision from dentists and without prescription, there
is no evidence of increased risk to patients. And under
two health pilot programs in California, dental hygienists
saw more than 20,000 patients without supervision by a
dentist and without prescriptions with no adverse results.
So why is the dental association working so hard to defeat
this bill? Could it be that dentists are opposed to it
because hygienists represent a huge profit center in their
practices and they don't want to lose control over them?
A report released this year by the nonprofit Dental Health
Foundation concluded that the teeth of California's children
are decaying at epidemic levels. The report found that
6 percent of the state's poorest children are in so much
pain or have such bad infections that they are in urgent
need of care.
There is an oral health care crisis in this state. Hygienists
can help relieve the pain and suffering for millions --
if legislators stand up to the state's dentists.
Copyright © The Sacramento Bee, (916) 321-1000
|