|
2008 Spring Scientific Session
| Information
Table Clinic Abstracts from the 2008 Spring Scientific Session |
The Coenzyme
Q10 Periodontal Therapy
1st Place Informational
The Coenzyme Q10 Periodontal Therapy
Kristina Pavone and Paula Nguyen
School: Cerritos
Background: Evidence based research suggests that
topical application and oral administration of Coenzyme Q10 aids
in the prevention and treatment of periodontal disease by improving
periodontal scores, promoting gingival healing after scaling and
root planning, and reducing the number of motile microorganisms
during periodontal disease.
Methods: A review of literature was conducted
to examine the effect of Coenzyme Q10 on periodontal disease.
Results: Coenzyme Q10 improved periodontal scores
in patients with periodontal disease and proved effective as a therapeutic
agent in reduction and elimination of microorganisms at the gingival
level of patients with periodontal disease by increasing the efficacy
of the immune system in the host.
Conclusion: The data demonstrates that coenzyme
Q10 is beneficial during the treatment and prevention of periodontal
disease in combination with scaling and root planning therapy. Coenzyme
Q10 should be considered an adjunctive therapy in the treatment
of periodontal disease.
Forensic Odontology:
Human identification and bitemark analysis
2nd Place Informational
Forensic Odontology: Human Identification and Bitemark Analysis
Priscilla Gerakos and Zahra Etemadi
School: Cerritos
Background: Forensic odontology is a branch of
forensic medicine that deals with the appropriate examination, handling,
and presentation of dental evidence in a court of law. It is used
for identification of unknown human remains, assisting at the scene
of a mass disaster, age estimations, analysis of bite marks, and
presentation of bite and weapon mark evidence in court as an expert
witness.
Methods: Information from a variety of profession
journals and online resources was reviewed.
Results: Many methods of human identification
exist, which include comparative dental identification, postmortem
dental profiling, labeled dental prosthesis, dental appliances,
toothprints for children, dental materials, DNA analysis, and bitemark
analysis.
Conclusion: For the dental care provider it is
essential to maintain accurate dental records for possible future
identification purposes of human remains, or for utilization in
court for victims of violent crimes.
Title: What are the
Effects of Tea on the Oral Cavity?
3rd Place Informational
What are the effects of tea on the oral cavity?
Syreeta Blas and Jamielyn Bustamante
School: Riverside Community College
Background: Research studies have reported tea
derivatives positively affect the oral cavity. Tea is one of the
most widely consumed beverages in the world. Currently, there are
a number of teas out in the market, which include green tea, black
tea, oolong tea and also tea tree oils.
Methods: A review of literatures was conducted
to gather the most up to date information supporting the effects
of tea on the oral cavity.
Results: Further studies need to be done in order
for these effects of tea on the oral cavity to be marketed.
Conclusion: Preliminary studies suggest some of
the effects of tea components within the oral cavity may include
possible caries reduction, antibacterial, improvement of periodontal
disease and possible anti-cancer properties. With further studies,
the effects of tea will hopefully someday benefit patients as an
adjunct therapy.
Research Table Clinic winners from the 2008
Spring Scientific Session
Toss the Floss?
1st Place Research
Toss the Floss
Irene Jaeger-Stemmer and Jila Torabi
School: Cerritos
Purpose: Floss can not reach periodontal pockets
greater than 3mm.
The purpose of this study was to determine if floss is being recommended
as a preventive or maintenance homecare device to patients with
moderate to severe periodontal disease.
Method: A survey was distributed to 205 randomly
selected CDHA members to determine their homecare device recommendations
to patients with different periodontal status.
Results: The survey results revealed that the
majority of dental hygienists are recommending floss to patients
with moderate to severe periodontal disease.
Conclusions: Dental hygienists are making the
effort to recommend oral hygiene devices suitable to patients with
periodontal disease. However, since floss can not reach periodontal
pockets greater than 3mm, simplification and modification of homecare
devices may increase patient compliance and the success rate of
overall treatment.
Topical Anesthesia:
Assessing Anesthetics on Puncture Pain
2nd Place Research
Topical Anesthesia: Assessing Anesthetics on Puncture Pain
Kindall Fernando and Candice Rogers
School: Cypress
Background: This study assessed whether different
formulas of topical anesthetic were more effective in reducing pain
during the administration of local anesthesia.
Methods: A blind study was conducted on a random
convenient sample (N=48). Four formulas of topical anesthetic were
compared using ASA infiltrations and Incisive nerve blocks. After
all injections participants were asked to translate sensation of
pain into a scale of 1-10. Statistics were analyzed by a Winks Statistical
Software Program.
Results: An 18% benzocaine 2% tetracaine formula
was proven to be superior in reducing pain during the insertion
of a dental needle. A 6% lidocaine and 4% tetracaine formula showed
profound anesthesia for durations of 30-45 min.
Conclusion: Topical anesthetic should be chosen
based on duration and intent of use. Use 18% benzocaine 2% tetracaine
for short duration procedures and 6% lidocaine 4% tetracaine for
long duration procedures.
“Rinse It Away”
3rd Place Research
Rinse it away
Tracy Blee, Heather Dotta and Sharon Gudmundson
School: Sacramento City College
Background: To determine whether pre-procedural
rinsing reduces the bacterial load in the oral cavity.
Methods: Baseline swab cultures were taken from
the right buccal mucosa of 40 individuals. The group was then separated
into 4 test groups, containing 10 people in each: 30 second water
rinse and 15, 30, and 60 second mouthrinse. After rinsing the allotted
times above, there was a two minute time lapse prior to swab culturing
the left buccal mucosa. (two minutes being the average time before
entering the mouth)
Results: The 30 second water rinse group had no
reduction, 15 second mouthrinse group had a 60% reduction, 30 second
mouthrinse group had a 90% reduction, and the 60 second mouthrinse
group had a 99% reduction.
Conclusions: Pre-procedural rinsing significantly
reduces bacteria in the oral cavity, most considerable being the
60 second mouthrinse; however, the 30 second would be ideal due
to time constraints and efficacy.
|